Fill out the written feedback form attached to this order (provide comments on the right of the table) and use track changes to review the attached research paper.
Reviewers need to use track change to provide constructive feedback for the authors!
Below please find a sample of reviewers’ comments to a submitted paper to the World Health & Population.
Thank you for agreeing to review the attached manuscript.
Some background on the journal:
World Health and Population (WHP) provides a forum for researchers and policymakers worldwide to publish original research, reviews, and commentaries on health- and population-related topics. WHP encourages the conduct and dissemination of applied research and policy analysis from diverse international settings. It is the goal of WHP to explore ideas, share best practices, and enable excellence in healthcare worldwide through publishing contributions by researchers, policymakers, and practitioners from these settings. Submissions of particular interest include evaluations of health and population interventions, which allow researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to gain insights further to promote the health and welfare of served populations.
Our preferred length for research papers is approximately 3,500 words (12-15 typewritten, double-spaced pages) inclusive of 4 figures and 4 tables. Submissions must include an abstract of 150 words or less. Pages should be numbered consecutively throughout.
Manuscript Title: ……
Reviewer’s Recommendation for Editors
(Please bold/underline your recommendation)
Accept as is with minor editing, Accept with minor revisions.
Reviewer’s comments for editors ONLY
(Please bold/underline your recommendation)
Please rate the publication priority from 1 (routine) to 5 (fast track):
1 2 3 4 5
Routine Fast Track
Rating (Please bold/underline your recommendation)
Please rate the paper from 1 (poor) to 5 (superior) on the following measures:
Overall Quality 1 2 3 4 5
Originality 1 2 3 4 5
Data 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
Analysis/Methods 1 2 3 4 5 N/A
Conclusions 1 2 3 4 5
Balance 1 2 3 4 5
Writing 1 2 3 4 5
Policy Relevance 1 2 3 4 5
Reviewer’s comments for author(s)
I would like to thank the author for their submission. I agree with the author that there is a strong need to strengthen XXXXX care services in Country X and improved organization in itself would go a long way to improving patient care.
However, there were some difficulties with the paper in a number of aspects which led to the recommendation to reject it for publication in this journal:
The paper does not have clearly designated sections or flow, so it is difficult to understand how the statements fit together to form a cohesive paper.
It was not clear what the final recommendations were in terms of: new policy, new organization, new referral pathways, make-up of the XXXXX team
It was not possible to determine a clear call to action for the reader based on these recommendations
I have a working knowledge of XXXXX care and organization in Country X and around Sao Paulo and the working of the SUS system yet I found the article difficult to interpret. I believe the general international audience of this journal will struggle to understand and apply the message.
Unfortunately, in its current format, I do not feel the paper is understandable or relevant to this journal’s broad international audience. I have used track change in the attached file to provide more constructive feedback for the author.
I hope the authors persevere and revise the document and submit it again to a more appropriate journal. There is a considerable need for advocacy for improved organization of XXXXX care services in Country X.
Let me know if you have any questions
Papers are written from scratch We have molded our writers to develop content for all assignments from scratch. This way, we promote originality and reduce cases of plagiarism that might affect your grades and hinder you from realizing your academic goals. We encourage our clients to indicate the deliverables that should be featured in the final paper. Our online help services allow one to make a clarification and even interact with the writer directly to help them understand the needs of the assignment. Many of our writers are professional tutors who understand the approaches that should be used to fulfill the specified instructions. Every time a client places an order on our system, we link them with the most qualified writer in the subject of interest.
YUnlike other writing companies, we encourage clients to draw back their money at any stage of the writing process if they experience any uncertainties with the quality of generated content. However, you will hardly have to make this decision because of our business approach that suits your needs.
We have an advanced plagiarism-detection system that flags any work that fails to meet the required academic expectations. Our company thrives in honesty, and as such, you will be guaranteed to achieve a paper that meets your expectations.
We encourage our clients to return papers for revision seven days after the last submission for free. Depending on the proposed changes, we will work on your article to achieve the desired expectations.
We uphold confidentiality and privacy through our interactions with clients, an aspect that has enhanced our relationship with prospective customers seeking for assignment help. We do not disclose your information with third-parties
We boast of a diverse pool of ENL and ESL professionals who respond with a personal touch to the needs of every client. Our focus is to become the best platform that offers specialized services to individuals to accomplish their academic goals.