“Please Watch this video for Artifact and Method proposal guideline ”
speech to something fresh not ben overanalyzed
“Use the template: RhetoricalCriticism.docx Preview the document In the upload file please”
1. Use the template for Abstract 1/2 page , Introduction 1page ,Artifact 2 pages , Method 3 pages .
for Rhetorical Criticism, Conclusion keep it empty for next assignment
2. See the 2 students sample to get the idea how to do it .
3. Please when you write go through all the question in each guidelines { artifact and method }and how many page to each question.
{{Artifact Proposal Guidelines:}}
1.Choose an artifact. The first step is to choose an artifact or a genre of artifacts. Please follow the guidelines from the analysis papers. The artifact can be any rhetorical situation such as a speech, text, film, or video clip. The artifact must be archived and public. This means I should be able to easily locate and view/listen to the artifact.
A. First, introduce the artifact. What is it? Who is in it? What is the purpose? (1 page)
You might need to provide extra details that were not presented in analysis papers.
B. Second, describe the importance of the artifact. Why is this artifact worth writing about? What is the significance? (1/2-1 page)
C. Please attach or include a way for me to access the artifact. This might be a link or a body of text. This should be in a separate document OR it can be pasted in the comment section of your Canvas submission.
D. Total page length: 1 ½ -2 pages
{{Method Proposal Guidelines}}
1. Choose a rhetorical criticism method. The second step is to choose an appropriate rhetorical criticism method from our textbook. You can choose any method [Traditional Criticism, Narrative Criticism ,Dramatism and Pentadic CriticismFantasy-Theme Criticism] , even a method we did not cover in class (e.g., feminist criticism). Please keep your choice to one method.
A. First, introduce the rhetorical criticism method. Think of this section as a brief overview of the method so that I can assess your understanding and use of it. You will use the textbook and lectures for this section.(1-1 ½ pages)
In your description of the method, you should address the purpose of the method and the reasons why the method is effective.
B. Second, you should describe why this method is useful for the artifact you chose. Why does this method work well in assessing the artifact? You will use your own argument, the textbook, and one additional outside source that supports your chosen method. (1-1 ½ pages)
The outside source can be a peer-reviewed article that uses your method. You should write about how the article uses this method in order to gain insight into the artifact. Tip: Each chapter in our book provides a references list for further reading. You can locate these readings at our library/online.
C. Third, you should also present a clear research question concerning the artifact or genre. I will help you with this step in the video below.
“Please Watch this 4 minute video on the purpose of research questions and some examples: ”
Additional Resources:
Research Questions in Rhetorical Analyses.docx
D. Total page length: 2.5 – 4 pages (Note: You will turn in this section as a separate assignment)
please see the samples in the upload file for students last semester
This our Textbooks:
Kuypers, J. A. (2016). Rhetorical criticism: Perspectives in action (Vol. 2). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Papers are written from scratch We have molded our writers to develop content for all assignments from scratch. This way, we promote originality and reduce cases of plagiarism that might affect your grades and hinder you from realizing your academic goals. We encourage our clients to indicate the deliverables that should be featured in the final paper. Our online help services allow one to make a clarification and even interact with the writer directly to help them understand the needs of the assignment. Many of our writers are professional tutors who understand the approaches that should be used to fulfill the specified instructions. Every time a client places an order on our system, we link them with the most qualified writer in the subject of interest.
YUnlike other writing companies, we encourage clients to draw back their money at any stage of the writing process if they experience any uncertainties with the quality of generated content. However, you will hardly have to make this decision because of our business approach that suits your needs.
We have an advanced plagiarism-detection system that flags any work that fails to meet the required academic expectations. Our company thrives in honesty, and as such, you will be guaranteed to achieve a paper that meets your expectations.
We encourage our clients to return papers for revision seven days after the last submission for free. Depending on the proposed changes, we will work on your article to achieve the desired expectations.
We uphold confidentiality and privacy through our interactions with clients, an aspect that has enhanced our relationship with prospective customers seeking for assignment help. We do not disclose your information with third-parties
We boast of a diverse pool of ENL and ESL professionals who respond with a personal touch to the needs of every client. Our focus is to become the best platform that offers specialized services to individuals to accomplish their academic goals.
