evaluation of role

odality and Therapeutic Activity Workshop: Group and Individual Evaluation
Submit Assignment
Due No Due Date Points 15 Submitting a text entry box, a website url, or a file upload Available until Dec 11 at 11:59pm

Course Weight: 15%- See rubric for assessment criteria.

Due Date: One week after workshop by midnight (11:59 pm).

(*mark of 0 if elements not submitted/late without consulting instructor for approval before due date as per policy)

Goal: For the student to critically analyze their own role in the implementation of the Modality and Therapeutic Activity Workshop.

For the student to critically analyze their group members’ role in the implementation of the Modality and Therapeutic Activity Workshop.

____________________________________________________________

One week after the Modality and Therapeutic Activity Workshop has been implemented each CYC student will submit a 4-5 page (not including APA title page) individual evaluation of their role along with the Group Members Rubric and summary. Classroom feedback may be included as it relates to the student’s individual role. Marks will be awarded for the student’s own ability to critically analyze their skill set.

The are two parts to this assignment:

1. Group member assessment-5%

Assessment of all group members participation during planning and implementation of the workshop and psycho-educational write up.

See template here:

Minimize File Preview

2. Self assessment-10%

Critical assessment of skills demonstrated during the planning and implementation of the workshop, therapeutic activity/discussion and psycho-educational write up.

____________________________________________________________

1. Group Member Evaluation (5%)

Complete Group Member Evaluation rubric and write a summary paragraph for each member.

2. Self Assessment (10%)

Critically analyze your role during the workshop/therapeutic activity & discussion. Focus on how you implemented the therapeutic activity and facilitated the small group discussion. Assess all the positive and negative aspects. Analyze your role during preparations for this assignment.

Discuss what you would do the same and what you would do differently if you were to engage in this assignment again (including planning, implementation of workshop, therapeutic activity/discussion.) Provide examples of the modification ideas such as the exact wording you would use or changes to the task. Include a clear statement of your goals and strengths for this workshop.

Provide concrete examples to support your observations and assessment.

____________________________________________________________

Formatting:

Typed in 12 point Times New Roman font

double spaced group members summary and Self Assessment

single space the group members rubric

Include a title page in APA format

Docx or .doc format

Submit one (1) file

Resources for APA referecing:

http://mohawkcollege.ca.libguides.com/CiteYourSources
(Links to an external site.)

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/

Rubric
Modality and Therapeutic Activity Workshop Assignment:Group and Individual Evaluation
odality and Therapeutic Activity Workshop: Group and Individual Evaluation
One week after the Modality and Therapeutic Activity Workshop has been implemented each CYC student will submit a 4-5 page (not including
APA title page) individual evaluation of their role along with the Group Members Rubric and summary. Classroom feedback may be included
as it relates to the student’s individual role. Marks will be awarded for the student’s own ability to critically analyze their skill set.
1.
Group Member Evaluation (5%)
Complete Group Member Evaluation rubric and write a summary paragraph for each member.
2.
Self Assessment (10%)
Critically analyze your role during the workshop/therapeutic activity & discussion. Focus on how you implemented the therapeutic activity and
facilitated the small group discussion. Assess all the positive and negative aspects. Analyze your role during preparations for this assignment.
Discuss what you would do the same and what you would do differently if you were to engage in this assignment again (including planning,
implementation of workshop, therapeutic activity/discussion.) Provide examples of the modification ideas such as the exact wording you
would use or changes to the task. Include a clear statement of your goals and strengths for this workshop.
Provide concrete examples to support your observations and assessment.
Group Member Evaluation
(single space this rubric)
Instructions:
(submit within
one week
after your workshop)
1. Enter the name of each group member across the top row of the table,
include yourself.
2. Using a scale of 0 – 5, with 0 being low and 5 being high, rate each member of the group for each of the criteria outlined on the left-hand
column. The following rubric will assist you in assigning a rating.
3. Add up the final marks for each of your colleagues.
4. At the end, follow the rubric with a brief summary of each member’s role/participation (or lack of) in completing this assignment.
Criteria
Your
Name
Group Members
Name
Group Members
Name
Group Members
Name
Group Members
Name
Attendance at meetings
Contribution to project planning
Tasks completed & on time
4 – 5
3
1 – 2
0
Demonstrated solid knowledge
of topic
Superior level of confidence in
presentation
Strong role in presentation
Did not refer to notes
Facilitates active class
interaction and discussion
Leadership role in contribution
to group effort
Attended all group meetings
Exceeded group expectations
Met all deadlines
Superior effort demonstrated
Goes beyond stated criteria
Demonstrated adequate
knowledge of topic
Adequately confident in
presentation
Active role in presentation
Minimal referral to notes
Attempted to initiate class
interaction and discussion
Contributed to group effort
Attended most group meetings
Met group expectations/met most
deadlines
Above average effort
demonstrated
Demonstrated minimal knowledge
of topic
Minimal confidence in presentation
Minimal role in presentation
Frequent reading from notes
Minimal attempt to initiate class
interaction and discussion
Minimal contribution to group
effort
Attended some group meetings
Met some group expectations
Met some deadlines
Average effort demonstrated
Did not demonstrate knowledge
of topic
Not confident in presentation
Does not complete role in
presentation
Reads notes
No attempt to initiate class
interaction and discussion
Does not contribute to group
effort
Does not attend most group
meetings
Fails to meet group expectations
Fails to meet deadlines
Below average effort
demonstrated
Ability to work as a team member
Knowledge of topic
Role & presentation in workshop (ie. Notes,
knowledge of topic)
Effect on group atmosphere, creativity
Problem solving, conflict resolution
Facilitation of class interaction
Overall contribution to project
Total : /50
Brief summary of each member’s role/participation in assignment.
Modality and Therapeutic Activity Workshop Assignment:Group and Individual Evaluation
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Part One: Group Member Evaluation- Rubric and Summary

4.0 pts
Level 5
Completed on or before due dateSuperior detail, includes rubricExcellent summary of each member’s role in assignmentExcellent example of assignment

3.0 pts
Level 3
Completed on or before due dateAdequate detail, includes rubricAdequate summary of each member’s role in assignment

2.0 pts
Level 2
Completed on due dateSome detailsSome summary of each member’s role in assignment

0.0 pts
Level 1
Not completed or late. Minimal detail, Minimal summary of each member’s role in assignment

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Part Two: Self Assessment-Content

4.0 pts
Level 5
Excellent understanding of assignment expectationsExcellent overview of all required areasThoughtful, professional responsesAn excellent example of the assignment

3.0 pts
Level 3
Adequate understanding of assignment expectationsAdequate overview of some required areasAdequate responsesWould benefit from changes to content or structure

2.0 pts
Level 2
Some understanding of assignment expectationsSome overview of few required areasSome responsesWould benefit from significant changes to content or structure

1.0 pts
Level 1
Limited/no understanding of assignment expectations. Overview of few/no required areas. Serious deficiencies or missing elements

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Part Two: Self Assessment-Application

5.0 pts
Level 5
Exemplary observationsExcellent linkage to course contentAll points supported by relevant concrete examplesCritical analysis of own strengths and goalsAbove expected criteria

3.75 pts
Level 3
Adequate observations or descriptions includedAdequate linkage to course contentAdequate examples includedAdequate analysis of own strengths and goals

2.5 pts
Level 2
Some observations includedSome linkage to course contentSome examples includedSome analysis of own strengths and goals

1.0 pts
Level 1
Missing observations. No links/limited links to course content. Minimal examples included. Minimal to no analysis of own strengths, goals. Relies predominantly on classroom feedback or sweeping generalizations

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Mechanics

2.0 pts
Full Marks
Well organized.No errors in spelling and or grammarAPA: error-free.Completed in a timely manner.Thoughtful and professional conclusions.

1.0 pts
Half Marks
Generally well organized.Minimal errors in spelling and or grammar.APA citation: errors.Completed in a timely manner.Some conclusions.

0.0 pts
No marks
Poorly organized, does not follow format. Major repeated errors in spelling and or grammar (more than 5 mistakes).APA citation: major errors. Not completed in a timely manner. No conclusions.

2.0 pts

Total Points: 15.0