Pro-Con Essay #1
Citing to and elaborating upon three cases we’ve studied and discussed during the course from the Case List provided on the day and time of the exam (Thursday, May 14 at 1-3pm), and strictly following the Rules for Writing, make as strong an argument as you can in the form of a persuasive essay in which you AGREE OR DISAGREE with the statement below. Your essay will be proportionally graded on how well you formulate the issue in each case you select, how well you summarize the rule and reasoning supporting the rule and any relevant exceptions to the rule in each case you select, how well you lay out the court’s analysis in each case you select, how well you state the conclusion of the court in each case you select and how well you have used each case you select to support your argument, pro or con.
Judges should be strictly bound to follow well-established property law precedents, even if they personally feel that times have changed and that injustice or bad law might result from adhering to the principle of stare decisis (“Let the decision stand;” the policy of common law courts to abide by or adhere to principles established by decisions in earlier cases).
So, as an example of the format you might adopt;
Smith v. Jones is an excellent example of why I (agree or disagree) that judges should be strictly bound to follow well-established property law precedents, even if they personally feel that times have changed and that injustice would result from adhering to the principle of stare decisis.
The issue before the court in Smith v. Jones was…
The court adopted/followed the rule that… The reason for this rule as stated by the court was…
The court’s analysis of the case looked at/examined/focused on…
The court concluded that…
(Your argument on why the case you selected supports your position pro or con)
Pro-Con Essay #2.
Citing to and elaborating upon three cases we’ve studied and discussed during the course from the Case List provided on the day and time of the exam (Thursday, May 14 at 1-3pm), and strictly following the Rules for Writing, make as strong an argument as you can in the form of a persuasive essay in which you AGREE OR DISAGREE with the statement below. Your essay will be proportionally graded on how well you formulate the issue in each case you select, how well you summarize the rule and reasoning supporting the rule and any relevant exceptions to the rule in each case you select, how well you lay out the court’s analysis in each case you select, how well you state the conclusion of the court in each case you select and how well you have used each case you select to support your argument, pro or con.
Judges should always favor the principle of grantor sovereignty and control over free alienability and other public policy considerations in deciding property rights cases.
Smith v. Jones is an excellent example of why judges should (or should not) always favor the principle of grantor/owner sovereignty and control over free alienability and other public policy considerations in deciding property rights cases.
The issue before the court in Smith v. Jones was…
The court adopted/followed the rule that… The reason for this rule as stated by the court was…
The court’s analysis of the case looked at/examined/focused on…
The court concluded that…
(Your argument on why the case you selected supports your position pro or con
Papers are written from scratch We have molded our writers to develop content for all assignments from scratch. This way, we promote originality and reduce cases of plagiarism that might affect your grades and hinder you from realizing your academic goals. We encourage our clients to indicate the deliverables that should be featured in the final paper. Our online help services allow one to make a clarification and even interact with the writer directly to help them understand the needs of the assignment. Many of our writers are professional tutors who understand the approaches that should be used to fulfill the specified instructions. Every time a client places an order on our system, we link them with the most qualified writer in the subject of interest.
YUnlike other writing companies, we encourage clients to draw back their money at any stage of the writing process if they experience any uncertainties with the quality of generated content. However, you will hardly have to make this decision because of our business approach that suits your needs.
We have an advanced plagiarism-detection system that flags any work that fails to meet the required academic expectations. Our company thrives in honesty, and as such, you will be guaranteed to achieve a paper that meets your expectations.
We encourage our clients to return papers for revision seven days after the last submission for free. Depending on the proposed changes, we will work on your article to achieve the desired expectations.
We uphold confidentiality and privacy through our interactions with clients, an aspect that has enhanced our relationship with prospective customers seeking for assignment help. We do not disclose your information with third-parties
We boast of a diverse pool of ENL and ESL professionals who respond with a personal touch to the needs of every client. Our focus is to become the best platform that offers specialized services to individuals to accomplish their academic goals.
