**READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS. YOUR SUBMISSION MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS POSTED, TO INCLUDE FORMATTING AND WORD COUNT .**
This assessment is not timed. The questions are listed below so that you can work outside of Canvas. You will submit your responses in a Word or PDF document. Late submissions will not be accepted.
Submission Requirements:
– There are 2 questions. A good response is at least 300 words.
– Please be factual in your responses. Your quiz responses should be based on your course readings and other supplemental fact-based resources. Do not rest on opinion unless the question is requesting it.
– Formatting matters. Responses should be submitted in the order of how the questions are posted.
– Include the question number and question with your answer.
– Your answers should be in paragraph format.
– Use separate paragraphs for different thoughts when responding to each question.
– Include the following information in the upper left corner of your submission:
First and Last Name
Texas Government Module Assessment 4
GOVT2306-(INSERT YOUR SECTION) Fall 2020
– Spell check before submitting it.
– Cite all resources that you use, including your course text.
– Your submission should be in your words and based on your understanding.
-While using and citing direct quotes is acceptable, please limit use in your responses. Using and copying excessively throughout your responses does not show that you understand the course material.
– Include the word count underneath each of your responses.
– All assignments will be processed through TurnItIn for an immediate review of academic honesty. Incidents of plagiarism will be forwarded to the Dean of Students. Please see the syllabus regarding academic dishonesty.
Grading Rubric:
Grading Rubric:
Each question is worth 50 points. The following rubric will be used to grade it:
50 Points – full understanding or explanation. Points and examples are obvious and thought through. The response is well organized and follows the submission criteria. Adheres to minimum word count.
35 Points – good understanding or explanation. Points and examples are clear, but more detail can support it. The response is organized and follows the submission criteria. Adheres to minimum word count.
20 Points– general understanding. Includes some points and examples to support, but additional clarification is needed. There is minimal organization in the response style, or it does not follow the submission criteria. Submission may not adhere to the minimum word count.
5 Points– basic understanding. Lacks points and examples to support. There is minimal organization in the response style, or it does not follow the submission criteria. Submission does not adhere to the minimum word count.
0 Points – no credit for the response.
Questions:
Question #1: Could having the suspect’s attorney present at the grand jury questioning change the grand jury process? Support with documentation from the main part of the course text, as well as the Texas Tribune Bulletin.
Resources:
Course text Chapter 12
Re-read Section 12.4.2 Stages of Due Process
Read 12.4.2, Texas Tribune Bulletin ” Texas proposal would limit prosecutors in grand jury proceedings”
Question #2: Explain how this ruling affects Texas’ ability to collect on the franchise tax in the future. Support with documentation from the main part of the course text, as well as the Texas Tribune Bulletin.
Resources:
Course text Chapter 13
Read Section 13.4, Texas Tribune Bulletin “Texas loses lawsuit, but not the way officials feared”
QUESTION 1 SOURCE: TEXAS PROPOSAL WOULD LIMIT…
https://www.texastribune.org/2017/03/15/texas-proposal-would-limit-prosecutors-grand-jury-proceedings/#:~:text=19%20Case%20Map-,Texas%20proposal%20would%20limit%20prosecutors%20in%20grand%20jury%20proceedings,indict%20%E2%80%93%20unless%20there’s%20new%20evidence.
QUESTION 2 SOURCE: TEXAS LOSES TAX LAWSUIT
https://www.texastribune.org/2017/01/06/state-loses-tax-lawsuit-not-way-officials-fear
Papers are written from scratch We have molded our writers to develop content for all assignments from scratch. This way, we promote originality and reduce cases of plagiarism that might affect your grades and hinder you from realizing your academic goals. We encourage our clients to indicate the deliverables that should be featured in the final paper. Our online help services allow one to make a clarification and even interact with the writer directly to help them understand the needs of the assignment. Many of our writers are professional tutors who understand the approaches that should be used to fulfill the specified instructions. Every time a client places an order on our system, we link them with the most qualified writer in the subject of interest.
YUnlike other writing companies, we encourage clients to draw back their money at any stage of the writing process if they experience any uncertainties with the quality of generated content. However, you will hardly have to make this decision because of our business approach that suits your needs.
We have an advanced plagiarism-detection system that flags any work that fails to meet the required academic expectations. Our company thrives in honesty, and as such, you will be guaranteed to achieve a paper that meets your expectations.
We encourage our clients to return papers for revision seven days after the last submission for free. Depending on the proposed changes, we will work on your article to achieve the desired expectations.
We uphold confidentiality and privacy through our interactions with clients, an aspect that has enhanced our relationship with prospective customers seeking for assignment help. We do not disclose your information with third-parties
We boast of a diverse pool of ENL and ESL professionals who respond with a personal touch to the needs of every client. Our focus is to become the best platform that offers specialized services to individuals to accomplish their academic goals.
